David Fuller
Last Updated On: June 19, 2025
Polynucleotides, long chains of nucleotides renowned for their regenerative properties, have gained significant momentum in the field of aesthetic medicine. These biostimulants are showing promise in enhancing tissue repair, skin rejuvenation, and hydration. Clinical trials have highlighted the positive impact of polynucleotide-based injectables in improving skin elasticity, hydration, and reducing wrinkle depth—though outcomes can vary depending on the specific formulation and treatment protocol.
As demand for biostimulatory treatments grows, products like PhilArt and Profhilo have gained attention as effective solutions for skin revitalization. While both are designed to restore skin vitality, their composition and mechanisms differ, making it important to understand their distinctions before making a decision.
In this article, we will compare PhilArt and Profhilo, explore their benefits, indications, and possible side effects, providing you with the essential information to make a well-informed choice when selecting the right treatment for your needs.
About: Operating since 2016, Med Supply Solutions is known for being one of the industry’s top and trusted suppliers of cosmetic and viscosupplementation products. If you’re looking to buy Croma PhilArt Fillers online, contact our sales department for more information.
Hyaluronic acid
Polynucleotides
$119.00
Tier pricing
Save 0.84%
3 or more
$118.00 each
Save 1.68%
11 or more
$117.00 each
Save 2.52%
21 or more
$116.00 each
Polynucleotides
$99.00
Tier pricing
Save 1.01%
3 or more
$98.00 each
Save 2.02%
11 or more
$97.00 each
Save 3.03%
21 or more
$96.00 each
PhilArt is a polynucleotide injectable derived from ultra-purified salmon DNA. Unlike traditional fillers that focus on volume, PhilArt targets skin regeneration, marking it as part of a new generation of biostimulatory treatments that restore the skin’s natural vitality over time.
It is especially effective for early aging, dullness, and even post-acne scarring. PhilArt works to enhance the skin’s intrinsic health and structure, promoting both cosmetic improvement and long-term skin health.
PhilArt stimulates fibroblasts, promoting the production of collagen, elastin, and hyaluronic acid within the skin, creating a healthier dermal environment. It also supports angiogenesis (the formation of new blood vessels) and reduces oxidative stress, which contributes to healthier, firmer, and more radiant skin.
These mechanisms deliver visible improvements when used in a series of treatments spaced a few weeks apart.
Profhilo is a unique injectable hyaluronic acid (HA) product based on a patented hybrid complex. Unlike polynucleotide-based treatments, Profhilo combines high- and low-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid to provide sustained hydration and promote tissue remodeling.
Its goal is to naturally enhance skin firmness, elasticity, and radiance without adding volume, distinguishing it from traditional fillers that focus on plumping.
Profhilo works by stimulating the skin’s natural production of collagen and elastin, which results in firmer, more elastic skin over time. The initial lifting and tightening effect is noticeable within 1–2 weeks, followed by gradual improvements in skin texture and hydration that last several months.
Understanding the differences in treatment protocols between PhilArt and Profhilo is crucial for determining the best approach for each patient’s unique skin needs. These injectables have distinct regimens and techniques, reflecting their unique composition and intended results.
Feature | PhilArt Protocol | Profhilo Protocol |
Session Frequency | 2–3 sessions spaced 3–4 weeks apart; boosters every 4–6 months (optional) | 2 sessions, one month apart; refreshers every 4–6 months |
Injection Technique | Micro-intradermal or subdermal injections using fine-gauge needles | Injected at five standardized Bio Aesthetic Points (BAP) per side |
Typical Treatment Areas | Face, neck, décolletage, hands, and acne scars | Face, neck, and fine line smoothing |
Injection Volume | More injection points per session due to the thicker texture | Lower number of injection points, focusing on spread and diffusion |
PhilArt treatments typically require more injection sites per session due to its thicker consistency and its focus on deeper reparative actions. Profhilo, on the other hand, uses fewer injection points based on the BAP technique, which maximizes gel diffusion for overall hydration and tightening.
Both protocols are designed to deliver optimal results, with maintenance sessions to prolong the benefits. Consulting with a trained professional will help determine which approach, or a combination of techniques, suits your specific skin goals.
Choosing between PhilArt and Profhilo depends on your skin condition, aging concerns, and desired outcomes. Below is a breakdown to clarify which injectable is best suited for which patient profile:
PhilArt products are ideal for patients looking for deeper skin repair and long-term rejuvenation. They are particularly effective for:
PhilArt is recommended for patients who desire both immediate skin improvement and sustained tissue regeneration, making it ideal for moderate to severe signs of aging.
Profhilo focuses primarily on hydration and elasticity and is best suited for:
Profhilo is ideal for patients seeking a quick, noticeable glow and subtle lifting effects without the invasiveness of traditional fillers.
For patients looking to maximize the benefits of skin treatments, combining PhilArt and Profhilo can offer a comprehensive solution:
This combined approach is especially beneficial for patients with mixed concerns, such as moderate wrinkles accompanied by dryness, or those seeking a comprehensive skin quality upgrade.
Both PhilArt and Profhilo are effective skin boosters, each offering unique strengths tailored to different needs. PhilArt treatments are designed to promote deep tissue regeneration and long-lasting repair, making them ideal for individuals seeking structural rejuvenation and visible lifting, particularly in cases of advanced aging or skin damage.
On the other hand, Profhilo emphasizes rapid hydration and improvement of skin texture and radiance, providing a quick and noticeable glow with a mild lifting effect. It is particularly suited for those with early signs of aging or dry skin. Consulting with a licensed practitioner is crucial to determine which treatment best aligns with your skin type, goals, and aesthetic plan.
Yes, both are derived from biocompatible materials and show firm safety profiles in clinical settings.
PhilArt typically shows visible improvement after 4–6 weeks, while Profhilo delivers visible lift and moisture within 1–2 weeks.
Yes—stylistic layering is typical: Profhilo for hydration, PhilArt for deeper structural improvement.
PhilArt effects last about 6–9 months with maintenance, while Profhilo often maintains results for 4–6 months between sessions.
Rho NK, Han KH, Cho M, Kim HS. A survey on the cosmetic use of injectable polynucleotide: The pattern of practice among Korean Dermatologists. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2024;23(4):1243-1252. doi:10.1111/jocd.16125
Lee KWA, Chan KWL, Lee A, et al. Polynucleotides in Aesthetic Medicine: A review of current practices and Perceived effectiveness. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024;25(15):8224. doi:10.3390/ijms25158224
Ahmadi M. The efficacy of polynucleotide injections in aesthetic medicine: a review. The PMFA Journal. https://www.thepmfajournal.com/features/features/post/the-efficacy-of-polynucleotide-injections-in-aesthetic-medicine-a-review
Products
Cart
Log In
Newsletter
Subscribe for exclusive offers and updates on new arrivals
Share feedback at:
Working Hours
MON - SUN 9AM to 6PM EST
The Most Popular Brands
Med Supply Solutions
Support
Secure checkout is guaranteed with full adherence to PCI DSS payment standards.
Copyright 2025. Med Supply Solutions