Croma PhilArt Reviews – Clinician and Patient Perspectives

Last Updated On: June 24, 2025

Patient satisfaction is a key marker of success in aesthetic medicine. Research published in journals like the Aesthetic Surgery Journal and Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology has documented that minimally invasive procedures (such as dermal fillers and botulinum toxin injections) are associated with satisfaction rates that often exceed 80% when outcomes meet patient expectations. These findings underscore the importance of both patient experience and practitioner perspective when evaluating new products.

One such product gaining attention is Croma PhilArt, a polynucleotide-based injectable designed to promote skin regeneration. As its popularity rises, both clinicians and patients have started sharing insights into its effectiveness and overall experience.

In this article, we’ll explore Croma PhilArt reviews from both medical professionals and users, covering expectations, results, comfort, and safety.

Key Takeaways

• Croma PhilArt is a polynucleotide-based injectable that promotes skin regeneration and is gaining popularity in aesthetic medicine.
• Clinicians appreciate PhilArt for its ability to stimulate collagen and elastic fiber production with minimal irritation and downtime.
• Its smooth gel consistency makes it easy to inject, even for less experienced practitioners, and is compatible with other aesthetic treatments like microneedling and laser resurfacing.
• PhilArt is effective in treating delicate areas such as the face, neck, and under-eye region, with visible improvements in skin texture, tone, and elasticity.
• Patients report natural-looking results, including improved hydration and smoother skin, with minimal swelling or bruising during recovery.
• The product is available in specialized variants like PhilArt Eye, Hair, and Next, each targeting specific aesthetic concerns such as under-eye rejuvenation, hair density, and mature skin.
• Compared to other injectables like Profhilo and Plinest, PhilArt offers deeper tissue repair and longer-lasting results, with gradual improvements seen after 2–3 sessions.
• PhilArt is suitable for a wide range of skin types and can be combined with other treatments for enhanced effects.

About: Operating since 2016, Med Supply Solutions is known for being one of the industry’s top and trusted suppliers of cosmetic and viscosupplementation products. If you’re looking to buy Croma PhilArt Fillers online, contact our sales department for more information.  

CROMA PhilArt NEXT

Hyaluronic acid

Polynucleotides

$119.00

Tier pricing

Save 0.84%

3 or more

$118.00 each

Save 1.68%

11 or more

$117.00 each

Save 2.52%

21 or more

$116.00 each

CROMA PhilArt EYE

Polynucleotides

$99.00

Tier pricing

Save 1.01%

3 or more

$98.00 each

Save 2.02%

11 or more

$97.00 each

Save 3.03%

21 or more

$96.00 each

Clinician Experiences with PhilArt

Clinicians across the fields of dermatology and aesthetic medicine have shared valuable insights regarding their use of PhilArt. Feedback highlights its regenerative potential, versatility, and compatibility with other aesthetic procedures, making it a sought-after solution in daily practice.

Biostimulation & Technical Ease

Dermatologists and injectors often praise PhilArt’s PN‑HPT® technology for its ability to consistently stimulate fibroblasts, which leads to strong collagen and elastic fiber formation with minimal irritation or downtime. 

The smooth, gel-like consistency of the product makes it easy to inject with microinjections, which is ideal for both seasoned professionals and clinicians new to polynucleotide-based injectables.

Zone Versatility

PhilArt has become particularly popular for its ability to treat delicate areas such as the face, neck, décolleté, and hands, including the sensitive under-eye skin. Specialized variants, like PhilArt Eye, have been praised for targeting fine lines, dark circles, and puffiness in this fragile zone. 

Clinics have reported improved skin rejuvenation without the bruising often associated with other injectables, leading to quicker and more noticeable results.

Synergy with Other Procedures

Many clinicians integrate PhilArt into multimodal treatment protocols, combining it with laser resurfacing, microneedling, or chemical peels. Feedback from practitioners indicates that PhilArt enhances skin texture and accelerates healing when paired with these complementary therapies. Tissue remodeling and faster recovery times are notable outcomes when used in combination with other skin therapies.

PhilArt is frequently cited for its ability to provide both subtle and profound rejuvenation, depending on the target area and the treatment pattern used. Whether for facial rejuvenation, scar repair, or under-eye rejuvenation, clinicians have reported excellent outcomes, especially given its ease of use and versatility.

Patient Perspectives on PhilArt Results

Patients who have undergone PhilArt treatments frequently report noticeable improvements in skin texture, tone, and elasticity, particularly in areas prone to aging or sensitivity. The feedback is overwhelmingly positive, with many patients appreciating the natural-looking enhancements that don’t require invasive procedures or extended downtimes.

Image Courtesy of Dr Rita Rakus

Before: Patients with under-eye bags often present with puffiness, dark circles, and sagging skin. These conditions are typically caused by fluid retention, thinning of the dermal layers, and poor circulation. The skin may appear dull and creased, with a tired or aged expression that’s difficult to mask, even with makeup or skincare products.

After: The patient experienced significant improvements after 2–3 sessions. The polynucleotides in PhilArt stimulate collagen renewal while also improving microcirculation, which leads to a brighter, smoother appearance. Eye bags appear less prominent, and patients report a more youthful and energized look with minimal swelling or bruising during recovery.

Image Courtesy of Dr Rita Rakus

Before: Patients often present with dull, tired-looking skin marked by fine lines, uneven texture, and early signs of sagging. Dehydration and volume loss may contribute to a lackluster complexion, especially around the cheeks, mouth, and jawline. Many individuals seek solutions that restore glow and firmness without relying on fillers or invasive procedures.

After: With just 2–3 sessions, the skin tone becomes more even, and the elasticity improves, creating a natural glow. Results are subtle and gradual, offering patients a refreshed look without looking overdone.

PhilArt Eye, Hair, and Next – Feedback by Variant

The expanding line of PhilArt biostimulators—PhilArt Eye, PhilArt Hair, and PhilArt Next—provides targeted solutions for various aesthetic concerns. Each variant utilizes polynucleotide technology tailored for different areas of the face, scalp, and aging skin.

• PhilArt Eye: Specially formulated for the delicate periorbital area, PhilArt Eye addresses dark circles, fine lines, and tired eyes. Clinicians report visible improvements in hydration and smoother skin texture after 1–2 sessions. Patients also rave about the subtle yet noticeable brightening effect, without the puffiness or irritation associated with other under-eye treatments.
• PhilArt Hair: Applied to the scalp, PhilArt Hair supports hair health and density by improving microcirculation. Early reports from users show less shedding, with stronger, shinier hair after several sessions. While clinical data is still evolving, anecdotal results suggest promising improvements, particularly for individuals seeking non-invasive treatments to support hair regrowth.
• PhilArt Next: Designed for mature or photoaged skin, PhilArt Next targets deeper dermal layers for skin rejuvenation. After 2–3 sessions, many patients notice improved elasticity, fewer visible wrinkles, and an overall enhanced skin luminosity. This variant is popular for treating the face, neck, and décolletage, offering both hydration and structure restoration.

With these expanding options, PhilArt allows practitioners to tailor regenerative treatments to the eyes, skin, and scalp, offering a comprehensive approach to biostimulation.

PhilArt Comparative Insights (vs other boosters)

Deciding between skin boosters means understanding their unique strengths and applications. Below is a brief comparison of PhilArt vs Profhilo and other PN options like Plinest. This comparison enables practitioners to select the most suitable solution for each patient’s skin care goals.

Conclusion

PhilArt stands out as a highly effective polynucleotide-based injectable offering long-term skin rejuvenation and subtle improvements across a range of treatment areas. Whether used for under-eye rejuvenation, hair density, or mature skin, PhilArt delivers impressive, natural-looking results with minimal downtime. Clinicians appreciate its regenerative action and ease of use, while patients report significant improvements in skin texture, elasticity, and overall hydration.

As clinical data continues to support its use, PhilArt proves to be a versatile and valuable addition to any aesthetic practice, providing natural results that meet the needs of today’s patients.

FAQs

1. What is the typical PhilArt treatment course?

Usually 3–4 sessions spaced 2–3 weeks apart, followed by maintenance every 3–6 months 

2. Are there side effects?

Minor redness, swelling, or pinpoint bruising post-injection may occur. Most settle within 24–48 hours.

3. Is PhilArt suitable for all skin types?

Yes. Its high-purity PN formula is safe for various skin types. However, avoid active infection or autoimmune flare.

4. Can PhilArt be combined with Profhilo?

Absolutely. Many clinicians layer PhilArt’s regenerative benefits with Profhilo’s hydration for enhanced results.

References

Al-Atif H, Alqarni A, Almuntashiri A, Almuntashiri A, Almarhabi M. Satisfaction among recipients of cosmetic facial filling procedures at dermatology clinics in Saudi Arabia: a national study. Clinical Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology. 2024;Volume 17:2465-2474. doi:10.2147/ccid.s470437

Fabi S, Alexiades M, Chatrath V, et al. Facial Aesthetic Priorities and Concerns: A Physician and Patient Perception Global survey. Aesthetic Surgery Journal. 2021;42(4):NP218-NP229. doi:10.1093/asj/sjab358