Lanluma vs Sculptra – Comparing Poly-L-Lactic Acid Fillers

Last Updated On: May 6, 2025

A 2020 clinical study revealed that poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) fillers can significantly improve skin elasticity, texture, and volume, with results lasting up to two years—far outpacing traditional hyaluronic acid fillers. Their collagen-stimulating power has made them a rising star in regenerative aesthetics.

Two of the most prominent PLLA-based treatments are Lanluma and Sculptra. Both are celebrated for their gradual, natural-looking effects, offering volumizing benefits for the face, body, and buttocks. Yet despite sharing the same base ingredient, they differ in formulation, indications, and user experience.

In this article, we’ll compare Lanluma vs Sculptra—breaking down their composition, application areas, results, and clinical nuances to help you make a confident, informed choice.

Key Takeaways

• Lanluma and Sculptra are both injectable fillers made with poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA), designed to stimulate natural collagen production for long-term volume restoration.
• Lanluma is available in two vial sizes—Lanluma V and Lanluma X—making it suitable for both facial and body treatments, such as buttock augmentation, hip dips, and facial contouring.
• Sculptra is primarily used for facial rejuvenation, effectively treating volume loss in areas like the cheeks, temples, and nasolabial folds.
• Both products can deliver results that last up to two years, but Lanluma may require fewer treatment sessions, offering better value for large-volume corrections.
• Aesthetic goals, treatment area, budget, and practitioner recommendation should guide the choice between the two.

About: Operating since 2016, Med Supply Solutions is known for being one of the industry’s top and trusted suppliers of cosmetic and viscosupplementation products. Contact our sales department for more information if you want to buy Lanluma Fillers online.  

LANLUMA V

$229.00

Tier pricing

Save 0.87%

3 or more

$227.00 each

Save 1.31%

11 or more

$226.00 each

Save 1.75%

21 or more

$225.00 each

Composition and Reconstitution Differences Between Lanluma and Sculptra

Both Lanluma and Sculptra utilize poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) to stimulate the body’s natural collagen production. However, their formulations and reconstitution methods differ, which can influence their suitability depending on the area of treatment and practitioner preference.

• Lanluma: Available in two vial sizes—Lanluma X (630 mg) for large body areas and Lanluma V (210 mg) for smaller zones. This size flexibility allows for customized dosing, with reconstitution volumes tailored to the specific area and goal of treatment.
• Sculptra: Comes in a standard 367.5 mg vial and is typically reconstituted with 5 to 20 mL of sterile water. The choice of dilution depends on the depth of injection and treatment region, though it is most commonly used for facial areas.

These preparation differences can impact injection techniques, treatment durations, and patient outcomes.

Indications and Treatment Areas: Choosing Lanluma or Sculptra

The choice between Lanluma and Sculptra depends on the patient’s aesthetic goals and the specific area targeted for treatment.

• Lanluma: Offers greater versatility, suitable for both facial rejuvenation and body contouring. Medical professionals frequently select Lanluma for buttock enhancement, hip dip correction, thigh reshaping, arm definition, and overall volume restoration.
• Sculptra: Primarily recommended for facial treatments, addressing volume loss in areas like the cheeks, temples, and nasolabial folds. Many patients prefer Sculptra for gradual and natural-looking facial improvements.

Lanluma is ideal for those looking for comprehensive rejuvenation, especially when targeting larger treatment zones or combining face and body contouring in a single treatment plan.

Clinical Results and Durability of Lanluma vs Sculptra

Both Lanluma and Sculptra produce gradual, natural-looking results through collagen stimulation, but they differ slightly in onset and visibility of outcomes.

• Lanluma users often report visible improvement within a few weeks, particularly in high-volume areas like the buttocks or face. Depending on the area and number of sessions, results can last up to two years or more. For a clearer understanding of what to expect, many patients explore Lanluma before and after photo galleries to view real-world transformations.
• Sculptra results typically emerge more slowly—often requiring several months to fully develop. However, with proper follow-up and maintenance, its effects are similarly long-lasting.

The effectiveness and longevity of both treatments can vary based on patient age, skin condition, lifestyle habits, and treatment adherence.

Cost-Effectiveness and Practical Considerations for Lanluma vs Sculptra

When evaluating a PLLA filler, cost-effectiveness often plays a key role—especially for patients considering treatment across multiple or larger body areas. Below is a simplified comparison:

Lanluma’s flexible dosing and broad treatment scope often translate into better value for patients pursuing full-body enhancement, whereas Sculptra may be more suited for facial-specific concerns.

Conclusion

Lanluma and Sculptra are both effective PLLA-based fillers, offering gradual, natural-looking results through collagen stimulation. While they share the same core ingredient, Lanluma stands out for its versatility in both facial and body treatments—particularly for patients seeking volume in areas like the buttocks, thighs, and hip dips. Its flexible vial sizes and fewer required sessions often make it the more cost-effective option for full-body contouring.

Sculptra, in contrast, remains a gold standard for facial rejuvenation. Patients often choose Sculptra to address volume loss in the cheeks, temples, and nasolabial folds, achieving subtle enhancements over time.

Ultimately, both options provide long-lasting improvements, and choosing the right one depends on individual goals, treatment areas, and consultation with an experienced aesthetic provider.

FAQs

1. How do Lanluma and Sculptra differ in their applications?

Practitioners use Lanluma for both face and body treatments, while they primarily use Sculptra to restore facial volume.

2. Which filler provides longer-lasting results?

Both offer results lasting up to two years, with individual longevity varying based on factors like metabolism and lifestyle.​

3. Are there differences in treatment sessions required?

Lanluma typically requires fewer sessions (1–3), whereas Sculptra often involves 2–4 sessions over several months.​

4. Is one more cost-effective than the other?

Lanluma may be more cost-effective for larger treatment areas due to its vial sizes and fewer sessions needed.​

References

Haddad A, Avelar L, Fabi SG, et al. Injectable poly-L-lactic acid for body aesthetic treatments: an international consensus on evidence assessment and practical recommendations. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024;1-11. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00266-024-04499-9 

Signori R, Barbosa ADP, Cezar-dos-Santos F, et al. Efficacy and safety of poly-L-lactic acid in facial aesthetics: a systematic review. Polymers. 2024;16(18):2564. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/16/18/2564